Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↑
Overall
40
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 44.1% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 23.8% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 13.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 21.4% 43 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 26.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — 12.9% 44 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 17.6% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 8.9% 50 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 21.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 18.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 22.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 30.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 33.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN PETRONIO Artistic Director 19.4% of Rev
JILL BRIENZA Board President —
ALISON MAZZOLA Board Member —
GARY HOLDER AND TODD WHITLEY Board Member —
JEAN-MARC FLACK Board Member —
JOA BALDINGER Board Member —
KEN TABACHNICK Secretary —
SHEILA HOLLENDER Board Member —
MALIN YHR Treasurer —
SARAH SILVER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN PETRONIO Artistic Director 21.8% of Rev
JONAS KLABIN Executive Director 13.9% of Rev
MARCUS MCGREGOR Board Member 1.8% of Rev
JILL BRIENZA Board President —
CLAIRE P FLACK Treasurer —
SARAH SILVER Secretary —
JOA BALDINGER Board Member —
JEAN-MARC FLACK Board Member —
GARY HOLDER Board Member —
SHEILA HOLLENDER Board Member —
ALISON MAZZOLA Board Member —
KEN TABACHNICK Board Member —
TODD WHITLEY Board Member —
MALIN YHR Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN PETRONIO Artistic Director 21.8% of Rev
JONAS KLABIN Executive Director 15.2% of Rev
MARCUS MCGREGOR Board Member 3.6% of Rev
JILL BRIENZA Board President —
CLAIRE P FLACK Treasurer —
SARAH SILVER Secretary —
JOA BALDINGER Board Member —
JEAN-MARC FLACK Board Member —
GARY HOLDER Board Member —
ALISON MAZZOLA Board Member —
KEN TABACHNICK Board Member —
TODD WHITLEY Board Member —
MALIN YHR Board Member —
SHEILA HOLLENDER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN PETRONIO Artistic Director 19.3% of Rev
JONAS KLABIN Executive Director 13.0% of Rev
YVAN GREENBERG Executive Director 8.5% of Rev
MARCUS MCGREGOR Board Member 6.0% of Rev
JILL BRIENZA Board President —
CLAIRE P FLACK Treasurer —
SARAH SILVER Secretary —
JOA BALDINGER Board Member —
JEAN-MARC FLACK Board Member —
ALISON MAZZOLA Board Member —
MALIN YHR Board Member —
SHEILA HOLLENDER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,227 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 44.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.