Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | — | — | 5.7% | 50 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2011 | — | — | 16.8% | 37 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 176 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 19 points above the peer median (45 vs. 26).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Overall score has gone from 37 → 50 over 2 years (improving by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 5.7% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.