Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 44 Fragile Recovery
2023 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 53 Fragile Recovery
2017 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 49 Fragile Recovery
2013 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Merri Lee Newby Board President
Timothy Johnson Treasurer
Rebecca King Secretary
Katherine Hajec Board President
Sheridan Black Board Member
Audre Brokes Board Member
Michael Berton Board Member
Barbara Ostroff Board Member
Lynn Thomas Board Member
Laura Goughan Board Member
Elizabeth Kell Board Member
Jenny Pondo Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Merri Lee Newby Board President
Arnold Ostroff Board President
Timothy Johnson Treasurer
Rebecca King Secretary
Michael Berton Board Member
Sheridan Black Board Member
Audre Brokes Board Member
Kate Frustillo Board Member
Katherine Hajec Board Member
Esther Houpt Board Member
Barbara Ostroff Board Member
Lynn Thomas Board Member
Marc Karasek Board Member
Laura Goughan Board Member
Elizabeth Kell Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Merri Lee Newby Board President
Arnold Ostroff Board President
Timothy Johnson Treasurer
Rebecca King Secretary
Michael Berton Board Member
Sheridan Black Board Member
Ann Boohar Board Member
Audre Brokes Board Member
Kate Frustillo Board Member
Katherine Hajec Board Member
Esther Houpt Board Member
Michael Kelly Board Member
Barbara Ostroff Board Member
Lynn Thomas Board Member
Roberta Winemiller Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARBARA OSTROFF Board Member
KRISTINE STRECKER Board Member
LYNN THOMAS Board Member
ROBERTA WINEMILLER Board Member
Merri Lee Newby Board President
Arnold Ostroff Board President
Timothy Johnson Treasurer
Rebecca King Secretary
Michael Berton Board Member
Sheridan Black Board Member
Ann Boohar Board Member
Audre Brokes Board Member
Kate Frustillo Board Member
Katherine Hajec Board Member
Esther Houpt Board Member
Michael Kelly Board Member
Barbara Ostroff Board Member
Kristine Strecker Board Member
Lynn Thomas Board Member
Roberta Winemiller Board Member
MERRI LEE NEWBY Board President
WILLIAM CONVILLE Board President
TIM JOHNSON Treasurer
REBECCA KING Secretary
MICHAEL BERTON Board Member
SHERIDEN BLACK Board Member
ANN BOOHAR Board Member
AUDRE BROKES Board Member
KATE FRUSTILLO Board Member
KATHERINE HAJEC Board Member
ESTHER HOUPT Board Member
NANCY KAUFFMAN Board Member
C MICHAEL KELLY Board Member
ARNOLD OSTROFF Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.