Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
48
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 29.0% 48 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 16.2% 47 Fragile Recovery
2021 27.0% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 12.6% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 9.0% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 14.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 14.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 16.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 18.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 13.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 14.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 16.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 13.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wen Huang Executive Director 17.5% of Rev
Kush Thomas Board President
Sewall Susan Treasurer
Bromberg Pamela Secretary
Berman Jeffrey Board Member
Clark Cynthia Board Member
Harwood Timothy Board Member
Jesurum Robert Board Member
Ostrander Harry Board Member
Sklar Ellen Board Member
Wertheim Edward Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kush Thomas Board President
Sklar Ellen Board President
Alexander Constantine Treasurer
Bromberg Pamela Secretary
Wen Huang Executive Director
Berman Jeffrey Board Member
Clark Cynthia Board Member
Eldrenkamp Paul Board Member
Jesurum Robert Board Member
Ostrander Harry Board Member
Sewall Susan Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wen Huang Executive Director 13.3% of Rev
Kush Thomas Board President
Sklar Ellen Board President
Alexander Constantine Treasurer
Bromberg Pamela Secretary
Berman Jeffrey Board Member
Clark Cynthia Board Member
Eldrenkamp Paul Board Member
Friedlaender Stephen Board Member
Jesurum Robert Board Member
Ostrander Harry Board Member
Sewall Susan Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wen Huang Executive Director 13.0% of Rev
Eldrenkamp Paul Board Member
Friedlaender Stephen Board Member
Jesurum Robert Board Member
Kush Thomas Board Member
Sewall Susan Board Member
Sklar Ellen Board Member
Berman Jeffrey Board President
Ostrander Harry Board President
Alexander Constantine Treasurer
Bromberg Pamela Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wen Huang Executive Director 12.9% of Rev
Wen Huang Executive Director 12.9% of Rev
Berman Jeffrey Board President
Ostrander Harry Board President
Alexander Constantine Treasurer
Bromberg Pamela Secretary
Eldrenkamp Paul Board Member
Friedlaender Stephen Board Member
Jesurum Robert Board Member
Kush Thomas Board Member
Sewall Susan Board Member
Sklar Ellen Board Member
Whitehouse Gabrielle Board Member
Berman Jeffrey Board President
Ostrander Harry Board President
Alexander Constantine Treasurer
Bromberg Pamela Secretary
Eldrenkamp Paul Board Member
Friedlaender Stephen Board Member
Jesurum Robert Board Member
Kush Thomas Board Member
Sewall Susan Board Member
Sklar Ellen Board Member
Whitehouse Gabrielle Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~14 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.