Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
55
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 3.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2023 25.8% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 62.7% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 12.3% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 22.5% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 40.3% 37 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 41.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 42.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 67.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 56.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 33.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 30.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 39.3% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2011 10.1% 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dianne Stengel Operations Mgr 2.7% of Rev
William Hunt Concertmaster 1.1% of Rev
Michael Quinn Board Member
Virginia Mills Orchestra Representative
Alan Lowne Board President
Carol Lowne Board President
Beverly Voos Board Member
Ben Martin Board Member
Yvonne Adams Board Member
Laurie Kennedy Board Member
Steve Landgren Board Member
Harrison Hartsough Board Member
David Mear Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
David Harman Board Member 1.1% of Rev
Dianne Stengel Operations Mgr 1.1% of Rev
William Hunt Concertmaster 0.5% of Rev
Jeanne Gray Board Member
David Mear Treasurer
Michael Quinn Board Member
Helen Zimmerman Orchestra Representative
Alan Lowne Board President
Carol Lowne Board President
Beverly Voos Board Member
Nicole Ozinkowski Board Member
Ben Martin Board Member
Yvonne Adams Board Member
Sue Brown Board Member
Virginia Mills Orchestra Representative

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dianne Stengel Operations Mgr 2.4% of Rev
David Harman Board Member 1.0% of Rev
William Hunt Concertmaster 0.4% of Rev
Jeanne Gray Board Member
David Mear Treasurer
Michael Quinn Board Member
Helen Zimmerman Orchestra Representative
Alan Lowne Board President
Carol Lowne Board President
Beverly Voos Board Member
Nicole Ozinkowski Board Member
Peggy Hall Board Member
Yvonne Adams Board Member
Sue Brown Board Member
Virginia Mills Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dianne Stengel Operations Mgr 3.6% of Rev
David Harman Board Member 1.8% of Rev
William Hunt Concertmaster 0.8% of Rev
Jeanne Gray Board Member
David Mear Treasurer
Michael Quinn Board Member
Helen Zimmerman Orchestra Representative
Alan Lowne Board President
Carol Lowne Board President
Beverly Voos Board Member
Julia Figueras Board Member
Nicole Ozinkowski Board Member
Peggy Hall Board Member
Yvonne Adams Board Member
Sue Brown Board Member
Virginia Mills Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 42 → 55 over 5 years (improving by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.