Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 2.1% 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 63.5% 18 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLY BAUMHOFER Board President
DAVID STANWOOD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID BEHNKE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID RHODERICK Board President
CLEONICE PATTON Treasurer
AMY WOOD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALEXANDER SENCHAK Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLY BAUMHOFER Board President
DAVID STANWOOD Secretary
DAVID BEHNKE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID RHODERICK Board President
CLEONICE PATTON Treasurer
AMY WOOD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALEXANDER SENCHAK BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOUISA GOULD Executive Director 1.4% of Rev
KIMBERLY BAUMHOFER Board President
DAVID STANWOOD Secretary
KIMBERLY BAUMHOFER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID BEHNKE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID STANWOOD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID RHODERICK Board President
CLEONICE PATTON Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOUISA GOULD Executive Director 33.0% of Rev
KIMBERLY BAUMHOFER Board President
DELORES E STEVENS BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID STANWOOD Secretary
KIMBERLY BAUMHOFER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID BEHNKE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
JAMES HK NORTON BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID STANWOOD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID RHODERICK Board President
STEPHEN ZABLOTNY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
JIM STEVENS BOARD OF DIRECTORS
CLEONICE PATTON Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (65 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.