Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
37
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 17.1% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 22.9% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 34.4% 40 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 15.7% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 9.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 13.1% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 17.9% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 11.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 11.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 27.1% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 10.3% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 16.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 23.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
David Wroe Board Member 12.8% of Rev
David Wroe Board Member 11.5% of Rev
Joe Rixon Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
Zach Blutner Executive Director 3.1% of Rev
Joe Rixon Executive Director 0.7% of Rev
Eva ONeil Executive Director 0.5% of Rev
Damien Dossin Board Member
Keith S Hertell Board Member
Barry Zucker Board Member
Julia Sen Board Member
Yifei Xu Executive Director
B Carol Molnar Board Member
John Mangraviti Board Member
Norman Luka Board Member
Philip Rinaldi Board Member
Suneeta Varkey Board Member
Jitendra Sharma Board Member
Sharon Roush Board Member
Jamie Lemberg Board Member
Damien Dossin Board Member
Mark Fleder Board Member
Byron Arison Board Member
David Badertscher Board Member
Robert Kelly Board Member
Michael Lindenberg Board Member
Maria Fuentes Board Member
Linda Habgood Board Member
Keith S Hertell Board Member
Barry Zucker Board Member
Rose-Marie Lyght Board Member
B Carol Molnar Board Member
John Mangaviti Board Member
Norman Luka Board Member
Philip Victor Rinaldi Board Member
Suneeta Varkey Board Member
Jitendra Sharma Board Member
Sharon Roush Board Member
Michael Linenberg Board Member
David Badertscher Board Member
Byron Arison Board Member
Michael Ash Board Member
Robert J Kelly Board Member
Mark Fleder Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
David Wroe Board Member 11.5% of Rev
Norman Luka Board Member
John Mangraviti Board Member
Michael Lindenberg Board Member
Jamie Lemberg Board Member
B Carol Molnar Board Member
Jitendra Sharma Board Member
Suneeta Varkey Board Member
Philip Rinaldi Board Member
Sharon Roush Board Member
Damien Dossin Board Member
David Badertscher Board Member
Byron Arison Board Member
Mark Fleder Board Member
Robert Kelly Board Member
Linda Habgood Board Member
Maria Fuentes Board Member
Keith S Hertell Board Member
Barry Zucker Board Member
Rose-Marie Lyght Board Member
Eva ONeil Executive Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 176 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 34 points above the peer median (60 vs. 26).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 44 → 37 over 5 years (declining by 7 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.