Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 9.3% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 9.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 9.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 13.1% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 12.5% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 19.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 10.3% 42 Fragile Recovery
2015 21.6% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 31.2% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 27.3% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 31.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 31.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAUREN CRAIG Executive Director 4.8% of Rev
REGINA BARBOZA Board Member 4.6% of Rev
REGINALD NOBLE Board Member
MARCY S DEPINA Board President
SAMER HANINI Board President
NICOLE WHALEN Treasurer
ONOME N ADEJEMILUA Secretary
KIM A COOK Board Member
ANDREW COOMBS Board Member
RICHARD GROSSKLAUS Board Member
DONNA WALKER-KUHNE Board President
DUPRE KELLY Board Member
MANUEL J ANTUNES Board Member
CHISA B HUTCHINSON Board Member
RYAN A MONROE Board Member
KITAB I ROLLINS Board Member
JOSEPH LEE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REGINA BARBOZA Executive Director 5.1% of Rev
JEREMY JOHNSON Executive Director 5.1% of Rev
MARCY S DEPINA Board President
SAMER HANINI Board President
LYNEIR RICHARDSON Treasurer
NICOLE WHALEN Treasurer
ONOME N ADEJEMILUA Secretary
KIYANA N RICHARDSON Board Member
MICHELE GONZALEZ Board Member
RICHARD GROSSKLAUS Board Member
DONNA WALKER-KUHNE Board Member
DUPRE DOITALL KELLY Board Member
CHIHO OKUIZUMI FEINDLER Board Member
MANUEL J ATUNES Board Member
VICTOR NICHOLS Board Member
PETER T ENGLOT Board Member
MICHELLE RICHARDSON Board Member
JENNIFER C CRITCHLEY ESQ Board Member
RYAN A MONROE Board Member
KITAB I ROLLINS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEREMY JOHNSON Executive Director 5.1% of Rev
REGINA BARBOZA Board Member 4.7% of Rev
PETER T ENGLOT Board President
LISA D LOVE ESQ Board President
MARCY S DEPINA Board President
LYNEIR RICHARDSON Treasurer
JENNIFER C CRITCHLEY ESQ Treasurer
MICHELLE RICHARDSON Secretary
LISA V CHOW ESQ Board Member
MICHELE GONZALEZ Board Member
RICHARD GROSSKLAUS Board Member
ONOME N ADEJEMILUA Board Member
DONNA WALKER-KUHNE Board Member
LARRY LEVERETT Board Member
KIYANA N RICHARDSON Board Member
CAROLYN SIMON Board Member
SAMER HANINI Board Member
MARSHELL JONES KUMAHOR Board Member
MARC LEIBOWITZ Board Member
VICTOR NICHOLS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 176 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 34 points above the peer median (60 vs. 26).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.