Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 45 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — — 46 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 1.5% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 16.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 4.9% 41 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 38 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 38 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 3.4% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 4.3% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — 4.2% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIELLE SHYLIT Board President —
DARIN PFEIFER Secretary —
DENISE HAYMAN-LOA Treasurer —
GINA ROSWELL Board Member —
OLIVIA ROCHE Board Member —
RONNIE CIMPRICH Board Member —
KELLI RANDLE Board Member —
BOB CIMPRICH Board Member —
LAUREN CORDOVA Board Member —
KATIE BABIN Board Member —
MATT ROSE Board Member —
EMMA FROST Board Member —
MAURY PEIPERL Board Member —
LOURDES STARR Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CRAIG GETTING Secretary 2.0% of Rev
BOB CIMPRICH Board President —
PAMELA VANECEK Board President —
TOBY APPEL Board Member —
MARCY BLISS Board Member —
RONNIE CIMPRICH Board Member —
DR JOSEPH CONWAY Board Member —
LOURDES STARR DEMERS Board Member —
DENISE HAYMAN-LOA Treasurer —
KAREN KRAMER Board Member —
KELLI RANDLE Board Member —
MAURY PEIPERL Board Member —
DANIELLE SHYLIT Board Member —
EMMA FROST Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CORI SOLOMON Executive Director 6.6% of Rev
HEATHER YELLE Board Member 3.0% of Rev
BOB CIMPRICH Board President —
PAMELA VANECEK Board President —
TOBY APPEL Board Member —
MARCY BLISS Board Member —
RONNIE CIMPRICH Board Member —
JOSEPH CONWAY Board Member —
DAVID DESCALZI Board Member —
DENISE HAYMAN-LOA Board Member —
KAREN KRAMER Board Member —
GREG ORLANDINI Secretary —
KELLI RANDLE Board Member —
DANIELLE SHYLIT Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CORI SOLOMON Executive Director 5.5% of Rev
TONY APPEL Board Member —
MARCY BLISS Board Member —
RONNIE CIMPRICH Board Member —
JOSEPH CONWAY Board Member —
JOSEPH CROOKSTON Board Member —
DAVID DESCALZI Board Member —
JARROD HARDEN Board Member —
DENISE HAYMAN-LOA Board Member —
KAREN KRAMER Board Member —
DAVID MANDERS Board Member —
MAURICE MITTS Board Member —
GREG ORLANDINI Board Member —
KELLI RANDLE Board Member —
RICHARD VANECEK Board Member —
BOB CIMPRICH Board President —
PAMELA VANECEK Board President —
FRED LOPEZ Treasurer —
YESSENIA GARCIA-LEBRON Secretary —
ALBERT APPEL Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 165 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (25 vs. 66).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.