The Founder's Trap
What does this mean?
10-year flat revenue, below-market executive comp, and a small board. The organization survives purely on the sweat equity of a founder, making it utterly un-transferable.
The Path Forward
The Dispersal
Forces succession planning and structural maturity. It requires raising capacity-building funds to decouple the organization's survival from the founder's personal sacrifice.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | 0.2% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | 0.1% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2021 | — | — | 0.2% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | 0.3% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2019 | — | — | 0.3% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | 0.3% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | 0.4% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | 0.5% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | 0.4% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2014 | — | — | 0.4% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | 0.3% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | 0.4% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | 0.5% | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kangang | Secretary | 0.1% of Rev | ||
| Ying Chen | Board President | 0.1% of Rev | ||
| Hao Wang | Board Member | 0.1% of Rev | ||
| Lois Kuang | Treasurer | 0.1% of Rev | ||
| Huaping Guo | Board Member | — | ||
| Vina Lee | Board Member | — | ||
| Huaping Guo | Board President | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).
5-year trend: The Founder's Trap
10-year flat revenue, below-market executive comp, and a small board. The organization survives purely on the sweat equity of a founder, making it utterly un-transferable.
Overall score has gone from 55 → 55 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 0.2% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.