Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Governance Advisory
📋 Compliance Status
Overdue: 192 days
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | 10.1% | 50 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | 37.9% | 56 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2022 | Hidden | Hidden | 10.7% | 66 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2021 | Hidden | Hidden | 7.5% | 65 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2020 | Hidden | Hidden | 4.1% | 69 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2019 | Hidden | Hidden | 12.6% | 52 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2018 | Hidden | Hidden | 10.2% | 48 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2017 | Hidden | Hidden | 25.0% | 40 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2016 | Hidden | Hidden | 23.6% | 46 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2015 | Hidden | Hidden | 11.1% | 49 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | Hidden | Hidden | 27.8% | 37 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2013 | Hidden | Hidden | 27.8% | 42 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2012 | Hidden | Hidden | 8.1% | 57 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2011 | Hidden | Hidden | 28.3% | 46 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 3 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A5.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 18 points below the peer median (22 vs. 40).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 69 → 50 over 5 years (declining by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 10.1% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
- Chalay, April holds 6 distinct authority roles, which creates concentration risk.
- Governance score is in the bottom quartile of the sector, typically driven by compensation concentration or related authority clustering.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.