Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
31
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 50.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 25.7% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 35.3% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 37.0% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 51 Fragile Recovery
2019 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rene Gonzalez Board Member 24.0% of Rev
Martin Romero Board Member 22.6% of Rev
Melissa Trevino Board President 4.3% of Rev
Julia Martinez Treasurer
Sylvia Chacon Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rene Gonzalez Board Member 12.8% of Rev
Martin Romero Board Member 9.5% of Rev
Melissa Trevino Board President 1.2% of Rev
Julia Martinez Treasurer
Sylvia Chacon Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rene Gonzalez Board Member 5.9% of Rev
Martin Romero Board Member 4.3% of Rev
Melissa Trevino Board President 0.5% of Rev
Julia Martinez Treasurer
Sylvia Chacon Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points above the peer median (45 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 50.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.