Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Recovery
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mark Niemer Board President
Greg Orwoll Treasurer
Jeannie Adams Board Member
Sarah Slaughter Board Member
Dan Knepper Board Member
Mia Scott Secretary
Payton Bellings Board President
Joe Amato Board Member
Tara Dunn Board Member
Susan Tonn Board Member
Tricia Mullen Board Member
Doug Henry Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mark Niemer Board President
Bob North Board President
Erin Beatty Secretary
Victoria Schuler Treasurer
Jeannie Adams Board Member
Kim Barnes Board Member
Mary Bryant Board Member
Jenna Matthew Board Member
Mark Oppedahl Board Member
Greg Orwoll Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points above the peer median (55 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.