Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 12.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 8.2% 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 3.8% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 13.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 10.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 14.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 17.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 17.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 20.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 18.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 23.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 17.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 21.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2010 21.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARLA SULLIVAN Board Member 13.4% of Rev
JOSEPH PAGLIARO Board Member
JOSEPH MINGOLELLO Board Member
JOHN CORRARO Board President
MICHELE PICCOLO Board Member
SEAN SULLIVAN Board Member
GEOFF KANNER Treasurer
KIM BURKHART Board Member
JUSTIN LACOURSIERE Board Member
MARY SUE FEIGE Secretary
DIANE BYRON Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARLA SULLIVAN Board Member 11.5% of Rev
JOSEPH PAGLIARO Board President
JOSEPH MINGOLELLO Board Member
JOHN CORRARO Board President
MICHELE PICCOLO Secretary
KEN NAPPI Board Member
SEAN SULLIVAN Board Member
LORI MCKEON Treasurer
DIANE BYRON Board President
KIM BURKHART Board Member
GEOFF KANNER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARLA SULLIVAN Board Member 3.5% of Rev
JOSEPH PAGLIARO Board President
JOSEPH MINGOLELLO Board Member
KATHY RIDDLE Board Member
JOHN CORRARO Board President
MICHELE PICCOLO Secretary
KEN NAPPI Board Member
RICK BELDEN Board Member
SEAN SULLIVAN Board Member
JODI DAWLEY Board Member
FRAN LEONARD Board Member
LORI MCKEON Treasurer
DIANE BYRON Board President
KIM BURKHART Board Member
GEOFF KANNER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARTIN MARCHITTO Executive Director 8.8% of Rev
JOSEPH PAGLIARO Board President
JOSEPH MINGOLELLO Board Member
MARILYN CORMACK Board Member
SUSAN MAURIELLO Board Member
KATHY RIDDLE Board President
JOHN CORRARO Board President
MICHELE PICCOLO Secretary
KEN NAPPI Board Member
RICK BELDEN Board Member
ERNESTINE LOUISE Board Member
MARGARET MIKAN Board Member
SEAN SULLIVAN Treasurer
JODI DAWLEY Board Member
FRAN LEONARD Board Member
LORI MCKEON Board Member
DIANE BYRON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 130 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points below the peer median (0 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.