Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — — 54 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Chen Ai Treasurer —
Vishva Ravat Board Member —
Adora Yucot-Murphy Board Member —
Margaret Hinsdale Board President —
Katie Route Board Member —
Amy Ledbetter Board President —
Talin Dabaghian Board Member —
Leland Schwantes Asst. Art. Dir. —
Namrata Wadhawan Secretary —
Priya Sadan Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Chen Ai Treasurer —
Vishva Ravat Board Member —
Martha Easton Board President —
Margie Hinsdale Board Member —
Alicia Kinsler Board Member —
Catherine Piontek Board President —
Noel Kitchen Secretary —
Amy Ledbetter Board Member —
Talin Dabaghian Board Member —
Leland Schwantes Asst. Art. Dir. —
Audrey Yeager Executive Dir. —
Priya Mehta Board Member —
Chen Ai Board Member —
Vishva Ravat Board Member —
Martha Easton Board President —
Margie Hinsdale Board Member —
Alicia Kinsler Board Member —
John Macdonald Board President —
Kiran Borra Treasurer —
Leland Schwantes Asst. Art. Dir. —
Talin Kenar Artistic Director —
Audrey Yeager Executive Dir. —
Priya Mehta Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Risa Kaplowitz Artistic Director —
Martha Easton Board President —
Margie Hinsdale Board Member —
Alicia Kinsler Board Member —
John Macdonald Board President —
Kiran Borra Treasurer —
Leland Schwantes Asst. Art. Dir. —
Talin Kenar Artistic Director —
Audrey Yeager Executive Dir. —
Lila Stangelang-Marchese Board Member —
Stacey P Murray Secretary —
Priya Mehta Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Risa Kaplowitz Artistic Director —
Martha Easton Board President —
Margie Hinsdale Board Member —
Alicia Bullock Board Member —
John Macdonald Board President —
Kiran Borra Treasurer —
Lila Stangelang-Marchese Board Member —
Stacey P Murray Secretary —
Priya Sadana Board Member —
Jane Griesinger Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 249 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points above the peer median (65 vs. 47).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.