Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 Hidden Hidden 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 11.0% 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 45 Fragile Recovery
2011 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MILKA RAMIREZ Board President
HOBERT HOLLOWAY Secretary
CARMEN M NAZARIO Board Member
NOHEMI QUINONES Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARMEN MARITZA NAZARIO EXECUTIVE DI 17.2% of Rev
MILKA RAMIREZ Board President
HOBERT HOLLOWAY Secretary
NOEMY QUINONES Treasurer
MAYARI GUZMAN - KATZ Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points above the peer median (90 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.