Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
33
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 44.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 36 Fragile Recovery
2021 31.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 9.3% 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 17.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alexis Peart Executive Director 21.7% of Rev
Andrew Barnwell Donor Relations 9.6% of Rev
Becca Allen Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
Nic Laschever Marketing & Administrative Coordinator 6.6% of Rev
Drew Mittelman Board President
Jack Silversin Board President
Josh Daniels Board Member
Margaret Suby Board Member
Ann Welch Secretary
Wendy Quinones Board Member
Jon Saxton Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rhaea D'Aliesio Administrator 6.5% of Rev
Nathalie Vatcher Administrative Assistant 5.6% of Rev
Alexis Peart Executive Director 3.9% of Rev
Tianhui Ng Board Member 1.1% of Rev
Greg Smucker Artistic Director
Patricia Maria Weinmann Artistic Director
Drew Mittelman Board President
Jack Silversin Board President
Josh Daniels Board Member
Margaret Suby Board Member
Ann Welch Secretary
Wendy Quinones Board Member
Jon Saxton Board Member
Chelsea Beatty Board Member
Jennifer Caraluzzi Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rhaea D'Aliesio Administrator 5.7% of Rev
Greg Smucker Artistic Director
Patricia Maria Weinmann Artistic Director
Tianhui Ng Board Member
Drew Mittelman Board President
Jack Silversin Board President
Josh Daniels Board Member
Margaret Suby Board Member
Ann Welch Secretary
Wendy Quinones Board Member
Jon Saxton Board Member
Chelsea Beatty Board Member
Jennifer Caraluzzi Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rhaea D'Aliesio Administrator 12.9% of Rev
Greg Smucker Artistic Director
Patricia Maria Weinmann Artistic Director
Tianhui Ng Board Member
Drew Mittelman Board President
Jack Silversin Board President
Josh Daniels Board Member
Dan Kaplan Treasurer
Margaret Suby Board Member
Ann Welch Secretary
Wendy Quinones Board Member
Jon Saxton Board Member
Chelsea Beatty Board Member
Jennifer Caraluzzi Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 8 points below the peer median (42 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 44.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.