Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 20.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 15.9% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 13.0% 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 15.7% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 18.4% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF ABSHEAR Board Member 20.3% of Rev
ROZLIN OPOLKA Board President
JOSIE RICHARDS VICE PRESIDE
MARISSA CHUPP Secretary
SCOTT MACCALLUM Treasurer
ROSE WILLEY Board Member
AMY NAUGLE Board Member
KATIE MUMBY Board Member
LORRIE GRAINGER ABDO Board Member
JACOB CONVERSE Board Member
TONIA GONZALEZ Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF ABSHEAR Board Member 16.3% of Rev
ALI HANSEN Board President
SUSAN CAULFIELD VICE PRESIDE
ROZLIN OPOLKA Secretary
SCOTT MACCALLUM Treasurer
ELIZABETH TEVIOTDALE Board Member
LINDA KEKIC Board Member
AUDREY MILLS Board Member
JILL ONGLEY Board Member
ROSAMOND ROBBERT Board Member
ROSE WILLEY Board Member
MARISSA CHUPP Board Member
AMY NAUGLE Board Member
JOSIE RICHARDS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF ABSHEAR Board Member 15.2% of Rev
SUSAN CAULFIELD VICE PRESIDE
ALI HANSEN Board President
LINDA KEKIC Board Member
SCOTT MACCALLUM Treasurer
AUDREY MILLS Board Member
JILL ONGLEY Board Member
ROSAMOND ROBBERT Board Member
ELIZABETH TEVIOTDALE Secretary
ROSE WILLEY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 45 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 29 points below the peer median (15 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.