Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 20.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 15.9% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 13.0% 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 15.7% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — 18.4% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF ABSHEAR Board Member 20.3% of Rev
ROZLIN OPOLKA Board President —
JOSIE RICHARDS VICE PRESIDE —
MARISSA CHUPP Secretary —
SCOTT MACCALLUM Treasurer —
ROSE WILLEY Board Member —
AMY NAUGLE Board Member —
KATIE MUMBY Board Member —
LORRIE GRAINGER ABDO Board Member —
JACOB CONVERSE Board Member —
TONIA GONZALEZ Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF ABSHEAR Board Member 16.3% of Rev
ALI HANSEN Board President —
SUSAN CAULFIELD VICE PRESIDE —
ROZLIN OPOLKA Secretary —
SCOTT MACCALLUM Treasurer —
ELIZABETH TEVIOTDALE Board Member —
LINDA KEKIC Board Member —
AUDREY MILLS Board Member —
JILL ONGLEY Board Member —
ROSAMOND ROBBERT Board Member —
ROSE WILLEY Board Member —
MARISSA CHUPP Board Member —
AMY NAUGLE Board Member —
JOSIE RICHARDS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEFF ABSHEAR Board Member 15.2% of Rev
SUSAN CAULFIELD VICE PRESIDE —
ALI HANSEN Board President —
LINDA KEKIC Board Member —
SCOTT MACCALLUM Treasurer —
AUDREY MILLS Board Member —
JILL ONGLEY Board Member —
ROSAMOND ROBBERT Board Member —
ELIZABETH TEVIOTDALE Secretary —
ROSE WILLEY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 177 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 56 points below the peer median (15 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.