Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 43 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA MCMULLAN Board President
ROBIN CAYETANO Secretary
THOMAS SCULLY Board Member
STEVE SIEGEL Board Member
YADIRA LOPEZ Board Member
ANA CERNOV Board Member
CRYSTAL YELVERTON Board Member
CAROL ZEE Board Member
DR TONY SPANO Executive Dir.
DEANNA NEWELL Board President
MONIKA OKKER Treasurer
SABRINA PICK Treasurer
CONNIE WONG Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR ANTHONY SPANO Executive Dir.
CAROL ZEE Board Member
CRYSTAL YELVERTON Board President
LAURA MCMULLAN Board President
LARA EMBRY Board Member
KAREN COMERFORD Treasurer
JILL GIARDINO Secretary
ANA CERNOV Board Member
CLAUDIA HUIZA Board Member
MONIKA OKKER Treasurer
ALISON HERBST Board Member
MICHAEL KING Board Member
BROOKE POWELL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points above the peer median (65 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.