Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
27
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 37 Fragile Recovery
2013 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORRAINE DODERO Board President
CORINNE SALVADOR Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORRAINE DODERO Board President
CORINNE SALVADOR Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORRAINE DODERO Board President
CORINNE SALVADOR Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORRAINE DODERO Board President
CORINNE SALVADOR Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 20 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (5 vs. 46).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.