Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 9.4% 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 15.0% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 16.4% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 15.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 42 Fragile Recovery
2017 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 23.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELE DE LA REZA Executive Director 5.1% of Rev
PETER KOPE Artistic Director 4.5% of Rev
ANDRES FRANCO Executive Director
PAUL PURDY Board President
CHRISTIE SEIBERT SMITH Board President
VIC DOZZI Treasurer
ANNA SHABALOV Secretary
ELLISON BARNES Board Member
CHEYENNE BUNTAIN Board Member
STEPHANIE HOOGENDOORN Board Member
MICHELE PETRUCCELLI Board Member
DAVID SEMAN Board Member
NATALEE SMITH Board Member
RACHEL TONEY Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELE DE LA REZA Executive Director 5.2% of Rev
PETER KOPE Artistic Director 4.1% of Rev
CHRISTIE SEIBERT SMITH Board President
PAUL PURDY Board President
VIC DOZZI Treasurer
ANNA SHABALOV Secretary
CHEYENNE BUNTAIN Board Member
KEVIN HORNER Board Member
JONATHAN C IAMS Board Member
MICHELE PETRUCCELLI Board Member
NATALEE SMITH Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELE DE LA REZA Executive Director 4.6% of Rev
PETER KOPE Artistic Director 3.8% of Rev
REBECCA HIMBERGER Executive Director 2.7% of Rev
SEAN GRAY Board Member
D KEVIN HORNER Board Member
JONATHAN C IAMS Secretary
TRACY MAHOOD Board President
MICHELE PETRUCCELLI Board President
MINDY ROSSI-STABLER Board Member
ROBIN M RYAN Treasurer
NATALEE SMITH Board Member
ANNA SHABALOV Board Member
CHRISTIE SEIBERT SMITH Board Member
JENNIFER BONFILI Board Member
CHEYENNE BUNTAIN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
REBECCA HIMBERGER Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
MICHELE DE LA REZA Artistic Director 3.9% of Rev
PETER KOPE Artistic Director 3.7% of Rev
SEAN GRAY Board Member
MONICA HERTZMAN Board President
D KEVIN HORNER Board Member
JONATHAN C IAMS Board Member
TRACY MAHOOD Board President
MICHELE PETRUCCELLI Board President
MINDY ROSSI-STABLER Board Member
ROBIN M RYAN Treasurer
WILLIAM D SEMINS Board Member
ANNA SHABALOV Board Member
CHRISTIE SEIBERT SMITH Board Member
STEPHEN BONTRAGER Board Member
KENNETH SPRUILL Board Member
NANCY SIMPRONIO Secretary
JENNIFER BONFILI Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.