Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
56
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 56 Fragile Recovery
2023 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 57 Fragile Recovery
2016 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 37 Fragile Recovery
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nicholas Regine Board President
Joseph Donofrio Artistic Director
Michael Pedicin Board Member
Albert J Paramito Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nicholas Regine Board President
Joseph Donofrio Artistic Director
Michael Pedicin Board Member
Albert J Paramito Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nicholas Regine Board President
Joseph Donofrio Artistic Director
Michael Pedicin Board Member
Albert Paramito Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
56 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 175 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 47 points above the peer median (80 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.