Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
34
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 40.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 68.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 62.6% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 38.7% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2018 51.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 59.8% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 39.4% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Andrea Stricker Office Manager 40.7% of Rev
Sheralyn Gillard Secretary
Dwight Mckenna Board President
Beverly Mckenna Board President
Leah M Coleman Board Member
Chris White Treasurer
Mark Stanton Mckenna Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Andrea Stricker Office Manager 37.5% of Rev
Andea Stricker Office Manager 26.1% of Rev
Kim Coleman Office Manager 21.4% of Rev
Melanie Lane Office Manager 6.8% of Rev
Christopher White Treasurer 0.4% of Rev
Dwight Mckenna Board President
Beverly Mckenna Board Member
Leah Mckenna Board Member
Sheralyn Gillard Secretary
Chris White Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 5 other orgs in LA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 8 points below the peer median (42 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 40.6% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~37 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.