Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Recovery
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 43 Fragile Recovery
2011 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL PLAUT Board President
CAROL NEUBERT VICE PRESIDE
DON SILLINGS Treasurer
SUE WHITINGER Secretary
EDDI BAIRD Board Member
JON HAWES Board Member
CAROL KATZ Board Member
DONNA MORSE Board Member
KEITH STONE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IRENE COHEN Board President
MICHAEL PLAUT VICE PRESIDE
NINA ANDERSEN Treasurer
SUE WHITINGER Secretary
EDDI BAIRD Board Member
ROY ERNST Board Member
KATHERINE LEVY Board Member
CAROL NEUBERT Board Member
EDIE SHILLITOE Board Member
AMANDA SCHLEGEL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IRENE COHEN Board President
DAN KNAPP VICE PRESIDE
NINA ANDERSEN Treasurer
MICHAEL PLAUT Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 24 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points above the peer median (75 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 55 over 5 years (improving by 14 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.