Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 46 Fragile Recovery
2023 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 60 Stable Stable Watch
2019 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILFRED DOHERTY Board President
PEARL KOSA Board Member
ANN FORRESTER Secretary
WILLIAM PECK Board Member
ROSALEE LOCKE Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Geraldine Piscitelli Board President
Geraldine Dempsey Board President
Pearl Kosa Board Member
Ann Forrester Secretary
Rosalie Locke Membership Chairlady
William Peck Board Member
Ian Walmsley Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Geraldine Piscitelli Board President
Lou Sasmore Board President
Helga Sharp Treasurer
Ann Forrester Secretary
Marty Taylor Board President
Geri Dempsey Board President
David Harrold Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 25 points above the peer median (55 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.