Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 47 Fragile Recovery
2023 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 36 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXANDRA MORA Secretary
JOSE VASQUEZ Board President
PATRICIA ONOFRE Treasurer
ISAAC VILLARREAL Board President
ALEXANDRA MORA Secretary
PATRICIA ONOFRE Treasurer
ISAAC VILLAREAL Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIA MERCADO-HERNANDEZ Secretary
PATRICIA ONOFRE Treasurer
ISAAC VILLAREAL Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIA MERCADO-HERNANDEZ Secretary
PATRICIA ONOFRE Treasurer
ISAAC VILLAREAL Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (55 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 44 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.