Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 50.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 50.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 37 Fragile Recovery
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ADAM KOPLAN Board President 46.2% of Rev
JESSICA D HILL Board President 19.5% of Rev
MARTHA KATZ Board President
ALISON YAGER Treasurer
JOEL LIPSITCH Board Member
R CHARLES HENN Board Member
JOSHUA M SPERRY Board Member
BARBARA STIMMEL PHD Board Member
HARLAN EPLAN Board Member
THOMAS JESULAITIS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ADAM KOPLAN Board President 63.3% of Rev
MARTHA KATZ Board President
ALISON YAGER Treasurer
JOEL LIPSITCH Board Member
R CHARLES HENN Board Member
JOSHUA M SPERRY Board Member
BARBARA STIMMEL PHD Board Member
HARLAN EPLAN Board Member
THOMAS JESULAITIS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (10 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 29 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.