Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
30
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 44.7% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 — — 43.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 25.7% 36 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 40.1% 36 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 36.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 36.7% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 34.9% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 36.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 37.0% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 33.3% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Zenas Baer Board Member —
Jennifer Jenness Board Member —
Amanda Myhre Board Member —
Scott Ecker Board Member —
Rachel Geinert Board Member —
David Huebner Board Member —
Rachel Asleson Board President —
Chelsea Brown Secretary —
Forrest Steinhoff Treasurer —
Tim Peterson Board President —
Monika Browne-Ecker Executive Director —
Jon Leiseth Artistic Director —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Zenas Baer Board Member —
Lori Horvik Board Member —
Forrest Steinhoff Board Member —
Tucker Lucas Board Member —
David Huebner Board Member —
Rachel Asleson Board President —
Chelsea Brown Secretary —
Tim Peterson Treasurer —
Carrie Wintersteen Key Employee —
Colt Neidhardt Executive Director —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Zenas Baer Board Member —
Scott Ecker Board Member —
Mik Reid Board Member —
Crystal Cossette-Knight Board Member —
Missy Teeters Board Member —
Anthony Faris Board President —
Maureen Olsen Secretary —
Rachel Asleson Board President —
Tim Peterson Treasurer —
Monika Browne-Ecker Key Employee —
Carolyn Wintersteen Executive Director —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (15 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 44.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.