Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
30
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 44.7% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 43.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 25.7% 36 Fragile Recovery
2021 40.1% 36 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 36.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 36.7% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 34.9% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 36.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 37.0% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 33.3% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Zenas Baer Board Member
Jennifer Jenness Board Member
Amanda Myhre Board Member
Scott Ecker Board Member
Rachel Geinert Board Member
David Huebner Board Member
Rachel Asleson Board President
Chelsea Brown Secretary
Forrest Steinhoff Treasurer
Tim Peterson Board President
Monika Browne-Ecker Executive Director
Jon Leiseth Artistic Director

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Zenas Baer Board Member
Lori Horvik Board Member
Forrest Steinhoff Board Member
Tucker Lucas Board Member
David Huebner Board Member
Rachel Asleson Board President
Chelsea Brown Secretary
Tim Peterson Treasurer
Carrie Wintersteen Key Employee
Colt Neidhardt Executive Director

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Zenas Baer Board Member
Scott Ecker Board Member
Mik Reid Board Member
Crystal Cossette-Knight Board Member
Missy Teeters Board Member
Anthony Faris Board President
Maureen Olsen Secretary
Rachel Asleson Board President
Tim Peterson Treasurer
Monika Browne-Ecker Key Employee
Carolyn Wintersteen Executive Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points below the peer median (15 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 44.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.