Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 48 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 49 Fragile Recovery
2014 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 47 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mitchell Kahn Board President
Ray Horak Board Member
Sharon Benson Board Member
Nancy Riches Board Member
Susan Sharp Board Member
Sherrie Kahn Treasurer
Wendy LaPrade Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mitchell Kahn Board President
Ray Horak Board Member
Sharon Benson Board Member
Nancy Riches Board Member
Susan Sharp Board Member
Sherrie Kahn Treasurer
Wendy LaPrade Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mitchell Kahn Board President
Susan Sharp Board Member
Sharon Benson Board Member
Nancy Riches Board Member
Wendy LaPrade Board Member
Ray Blank Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points below the peer median (25 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 39 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.