Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 — — — 57 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 60 Stable Stable Watch
2019 — — — 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 — — — 59 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 59 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 — — — 59 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Craig Bond Board President —
Alex Dell Board President —
Kim Nightengale Secretary —
Catlin Urban Treasurer —
Katie Foster Governor —
Angela Daniels Governor —
Mike Kenna Governor —
Anna-Beth Wheaton Governor —
Mitchell Smith Governor —
Meghan O'Toole Tuazon Governor —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mitchell H Smith Board President —
Alex Dell Board President —
Jess LiBrizzi Secretary —
Catlin Urban Treasurer —
Katie Foster Governor —
Angela Daniels Governor —
Mike Kenna Governor —
Ann Milliken Governor —
Taylor Wilkinson Governor —
Meghan O'Toole Tuazon Governor —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points above the peer median (100 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 53 → 61 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.