Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
25
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 23.5% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 20.7% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 7.9% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 17.5% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 9.4% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 14.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 11.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 12.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Paula Bernstein Executive Dir. 10.9% of Rev
Mikel Wintermantel Ex Dir Emeritus 4.6% of Rev
Corey Fecteau Board President —
Jason Dilworth Board President —
Lizbeth Matz Treasurer —
Scott Reed Treasurer —
Crystal Abers Board Member —
Ryan Cooley Board Member —
Debra Eck Board Member —
Thomasine Graf Board Member —
Hayden Haynes Board Member —
Eric Van Druff Board Member —
Jan Comstock Board Member —
Linda Manross Secretary —
Colleen Gaynor Board Member —
Bradley Stevens Board Member —
John Bartimole Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mikel Wintermantel Co-Exec. Dir. 7.7% of Rev
John Bartimole Co-Exec. Dir. 2.2% of Rev
Corey Fecteau Board President —
Jason Dilworth Board President —
Lizbet Matz Treasurer —
Scott Reed Board Member —
Crystal Abers Board Member —
Ryan Cooley Board Member —
Debra Eck Board Member —
Jack Hart Board Member —
Eric Van Druff Board Member —
Jan Comstock Board Member —
John Stevens Secretary —
Denise Schneider Board Member —
Melissa Meyers Board Member —
Xavier Seubert Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MIKEL WINTERMANTEL Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
JOHN BARTIMOLE Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
CRYSTAL ABERS Board Member —
JOHN STEVENS Secretary —
PENNY MINNER Board Member —
DENISE SCHNEIDER Board Member —
JASON DILWORTH Board Member —
COREY FECTEAU Board President —
JACK HART Board Member —
LIZBETH MATZ Treasurer —
DEBRA ECK Board Member —
RYAN COOLEY Board Member —
IRA KATZENSTEIN Board President —
JAN COMSTOCK Board Member —
MELISSA MEYERS Board Member —
XAVIER SEUBERT Board Member —
ERIC VAN DRUFF Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 142 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 74 points below the peer median (0 vs. 74).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 36 → 25 over 5 years (declining by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.