Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
28
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 4.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 12.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 9.0% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 18 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 35 Fragile Recovery
2012 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH NAUGHTON Executive Director 17.4% of Rev
LINDSAY WEICHERT Board President
JENNIFER TIFFT Board President
SCOTT LOMBARDO Board Member
UYEN NGUYEN Treasurer
CYNTHIA PAYNE Board Member
AMBER LAWYER Secretary
JONATHAN FOX Board Member
SUZANNE EVANS Board Member
CAROL CHARLES Board Member
JAKE CASEY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH NAUGHTON Executive Director 13.5% of Rev
DALE MILLER Board Member
CAROL ZENZEL Board Member
UYEN NGUYEN Board Member
CYNTHIA PAYNE Board Member
AMBER LAWYER Secretary
AUTHUR KANERVIKO Board Member
MEG GEORGE Board Member
LINDSAY WEICHERT Board President
JENNIFER TIFFT Board President
SCOTT LOMBARDO Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DALE MILLER Board Member
CAROL ZENZEL Board Member
UYEN NGUYEN Board Member
AMBER LAWYER Board Member
JENNIFER TIFFT Board Member
ARTHUR KANERVIKO Board President
LINDSAY WEICHERT Board President
SCOTT LOMBARDO Treasurer
CYNTHIA PAYNE Secretary
DALE MILLER Board Member
CAROL ZENZEL Board Member
UYEN NGUYEN Board Member
CYNTHIA PAYNE Board Member
AMBER LAWYER Board Member
JENNIFER TIFFT Board Member
MEG GEORGE Board Member
ARTHUR KANERVIKO Board President
LINDSAY WEICHERT Board President
SCOTT LOMBARDO Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (0 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 18 → 28 over 5 years (improving by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.