Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN BRIGGS JOHNSON Board Member
PHIL COSMO Board President
MICHAEL CROWE Board Member
APRIL GRANT Board Member
PATRICIA MAHONEY Treasurer
CATHERINE NEWELL Board President
BOYD FOSTER Board Member
JULIE CLIFF Board Member
MARK ASHLEY Board Member
ED FORBES Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN BRIGGS JOHNSON Board Member
PHIL COSMO Board President
CRAIG CHEVALIER Secretary
RICHARD JOHNSON Board Member
PATRICIA MAHONEY Treasurer
CATHERINE NEWELL Board President
BOYD FOSTER Board Member
JULIE CLIFF Board Member
APRIL GRANT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 34 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 15 points above the peer median (50 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.