Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 2.1% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 3.2% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 5.3% 58 Fragile Recovery
2020 4.9% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 5.2% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 4.4% 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 4.9% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 4.1% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 6.0% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 4.5% 59 Fragile Recovery
2013 4.6% 49 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 6.2% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 5.7% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES LEMONS EXECUTIVE DI 2.6% of Rev
TERESA BRADY Board Member
CHERYL BRAUNSTEIN Board Member
MARYLOU BROWN Board Member
ADELE CONNORS Board President
MIKE FOOTE Secretary
SARAH GALVIN Board Member
JOAN GIGNOUX Board Member
DEBBIE HEIDECORN VICE PRESIDE
JENNIFER JENNINGS Board Member
CATHY JOHNSTON Treasurer
TAMMY LOEWY Board Member
NANCY MASTER Board Member
CATHY MCGRAW Board Member
MARGIE PHILO Board Member
DALE SKIVINGTON Board Member
TRACY SMITH Board President
MICHAEL TARDIF Board Member
DENJA WEIBRECHT Board Member
ALLIE WITHEE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES LEMONS EXECUTIVE DI 2.1% of Rev
JAMES LEMONS EXECUTIVE DI 1.2% of Rev
CHERYL BRAUNSTEIN Board Member
MARYLOU BROWN Board Member
ADELE CONNORS Board President
KATHY DAGGETT Board Member
MATTHEW FISHER Board Member
MIKE FOOTE Secretary
SARAH GALVIN Board Member
JOAN GIGNOUX Board Member
DEBBIE HEIDECORN VICE PRESIDE
TRACEY LEGAT HOWE Board Member
JENNIFER JENNINGS Board Member
CATHY JOHNSTON Treasurer
TAMMY LOEWY Board Member
NANCY MASTER Board Member
JUDY MEAGHER Board Member
DARCY NORFOLK Board Member
JOEL PELLER Board Member
MARGIE PHILO Board Member
DALE SKIVINGTON Board Member
TRACY SMITH Board President
MARYLOU BROWN VICE PRESIDE
ADELE CONNORS Board President
KATHY DAGGETT Board Member
MATTHEW FISHER Board Member
MIKE FOOTE Secretary
SARAH GALVIN Board Member
JOAN GIGNOUX Board Member
DEBBIE HEIDECORN Board Member
TRACEY LEGAT HOWE Board Member
CATHY JOHNSTON Treasurer
TAMMY LOEWY Board Member
NANCY MASTER Board Member
JUDY MEAGHER Board Member
DARCY NORFOLK Board Member
JOEL PELLER Board Member
MARGIE PHILO Board Member
DALE SKIVINGTON Board Member
TRACY SMITH Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES LEMONS Executive Dir. 2.0% of Rev
DARCY NORFOLK Board Member
TRACY SMITH Board President
MARYLOU BROWN Board President
TERESA BRADY Board Member
JUDY MEAGHER Secretary
ADELE CONNORS Board President
KATHY DAGGETT Board Member
MATTHEW FISHER Board Member
MIKE FOOTE Board Member
JOAN GIGNOUX Board Member
TRACEY LEGAT HOWE Board Member
CATHY JOHNSTON Treasurer
MARGIE PHILO Board Member
DIANE REYNOLDS Board Member
NANCY MASTER Board Member
SARAH GALVIN Board Member
DEBBIE HEIDECORN Board Member
TAMMY LOEWY Board Member
JOEL PELLER Board Member
DALE SKIVINGTON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.