Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 61 Stable Stable Watch
2023 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 58 Fragile Recovery
2021 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 57 Fragile Recovery
2014 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Paul Stoddard Board President
Jinny St Goar Secretary
Ardal Powell Treasurer
Sarah Kennedy Board President
Natalie Wren Board Member
Gwen Laster Board Member
Brad Hubbard Board Member
Timothy Brown Board Member
Kathleen Bosman Board Member
Laura Ramsey Russell Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Margery Groten Board President
Ian Murdoch Secretary
Ardal Powell Treasurer
Carl Gutowski Vice President
Lester Silver Board Member
Rebecca Driessen Board Member
Natalie Wren Board Member
Jim Lichtenberg Board Member
Peter Koepke Board Member
Sarah Kennedy Board Member
Paul Stoddard Board Member
Jinny St Goar Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 59 points above the peer median (90 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 58 → 61 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.