Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
49
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 3.7% 49 Fragile Recovery
2022 6.0% 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 9.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 7.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 7.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 1.7% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 2.3% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 3.1% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 3.4% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 3.9% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIA ELBAUM Board Member 3.2% of Rev
DANNY TAYLOR GENERAL MANA 2.6% of Rev
KEVIN JOHNSON EXECUTIVE DI 1.4% of Rev
STEPHEN P BABOULIS CHAIRMAN
JOHN BENNETT MD VICE CHAIRMA
JEFFREY STONE Treasurer
JAMES BARBA Board Member
ALAN GOLDBERG CHAIRMAN EME
WALTER BORISENOK Board Member
PHILIP CALDERONE Board Member
THOMAS E D'AMBRA Board Member
MARK EAGAN Board Member
GEORGE R HEARST III Board Member
MARILYN PENDERGAST Board Member
DOMINICK PURNOMO Board Member
KATHY M SHEEHAN Board Member
RANDOLPH F TREECE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM PISKUTZ EXECUTIVE DI 3.0% of Rev
JULIA ELBAUM Board Member 3.0% of Rev
STEPHEN P BABOULIS CHAIRMAN
JOHN BENNETT MD VICE CHAIRMA
JEFFREY STONE Treasurer
ALAN GOLDBERG CHAIRMAN EME
WALTER BORISENOK Board Member
PHILIP CALDERONE Board Member
THOMAS E D'AMBRA Board Member
MARK EAGAN Board Member
GEORGE R HEARST III Board Member
MARILYN PENDERGAST Board Member
DOMINICK PURNOMO Board Member
KATHY M SHEEHAN Board Member
RANDOLPH F TREECE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM PISKUTZ EXECUTIVE DI 3.2% of Rev
JULIA ELBAUM Board Member 3.0% of Rev
DANIEL TAYLOR Board Member 2.6% of Rev
SUSAN FOGARTY EXECUTIVE DI 2.5% of Rev
STEPHEN P BABOULIS CHAIRMAN
JOHN BENNETT MD VICE CHAIRMA
JEFFREY STONE Treasurer
ALAN GOLDBERG CHAIRMAN EME
WALTER BORISENOK Board Member
PHILIP CALDERONE Board Member
THOMAS E D'AMBRA Board Member
MARK EAGAN Board Member
GEORGE R HEARST III Board Member
KEVIN O'CONNOR Board Member
MARILYN PENDERGAST Board Member
DOMINICK PURNOMO Board Member
KATHY M SHEEHAN BOARDMEMBER
RANDOLPH F TREECE BOARDMEMBER
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 49 over 5 years (improving by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.