Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2022 — — 11.8% 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 15.7% 53 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 35 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETH FRITZ-LOGREA Board Member 9.6% of Rev
JEAN LOGREA Board Member 1.2% of Rev
NICHOLAS LOGREA Board Member 1.0% of Rev
AMY HARTE Board President —
AMY HENRY Board Member —
MARIANA LJULJDURAJ Board Member —
KAREN LIGHTFOOT Treasurer —
DIANA MCCORMACK Board Member —
MARGARET YAWMAN Board President —
JOAN CURRY Board Member —
JOANN DANIEL-ONATIVIA Board Member —
STEVEN GIEGER Board Member —
FRANCES KEANE Board Member —
JENNIFER MAGEE Board Member —
KATHERINE VON JAN Board Member —
CATHARINE BRUENING Secretary —
TAMARAH BRIDGEWATER Board Member —
MICHELINA TRUSTMAN Board Member —
NICHOLAS LOGREA Board Member —
AMY HARTE Board President —
AMY HENRY Board Member —
MARIANA LJULJDURAJ Secretary —
MARGARET YAWMAN Board President —
JOANN DANIEL-ONATIVIA Treasurer —
STEVEN GIEGER Board Member —
FRANCES KEANE Board Member —
JENNIFER MAGEE Board Member —
TAMARAH BRIDGEWATER Board Member —
NICOLE BOUTMY DE KATZMANN Board Member —
LINDA JAMISON Board Member —
RUTHIE KALAI Board Member —
RENEE LAVERDIERE Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETH FRITZ-LOGREA Board Member 7.4% of Rev
JEAN LOGREA Board Member 1.1% of Rev
NICHOLAS LOGREA Board Member 0.8% of Rev
AMY HARTE Board President —
AMY HENRY Board Member —
MARIANA LJULJDJURAJ Board Member —
KAREN LIGHTFOOT Treasurer —
DIANA MCCORMACK Board Member —
MARGARET YAWMAN Board President —
JOAN CURRY Board Member —
JOANN DANIEL-ONATIVIA Board Member —
STEVEN GIEGER Board Member —
FRANCES KEANE Board Member —
JENNIFER MAGEE Board Member —
KATHERINE VON JAN Board Member —
CATHARINE BRUENING Secretary —
TAMARAH BRIDGEWATER Board Member —
MICHELINA TRUSTMAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points below the peer median (25 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.