Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 31.3% 46 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 24.1% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 43.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 47.6% 41 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 37.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 35.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 44.0% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 38.5% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 40.8% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 30.0% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2013 33.4% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2012 27.8% 42 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2011 29.7% 50 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNA BAILEY Executive Director 37.8% of Rev

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNA BAILEY Executive Director 31.3% of Rev

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNA BAILEY Executive Director 28.7% of Rev

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNA BAILEY Executive Director 26.1% of Rev

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNA BAILEY Executive Director 40.7% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points above the peer median (50 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 31.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~19 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.