Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
21
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2023 21 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 39.9% 18 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 1.6% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 35.5% 11 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 38.2% 11 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 47.4% 9 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 35.6% 11 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 45.2% 9 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 8.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 15.1% 20 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID FISHELSON Board President 17.9% of Rev
ERANA KRATOUNIS VICE PRESIDE 17.9% of Rev
MICHAEL JASCZ Board Member
DR HILDE HOOGENBOOM Board Member
THOMAS ZWEIFEL Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID FISHELSON Board President
ERANA KRATOUNIS VICE PRESIDE
MICHAEL JASCZ Board Member
DR HILDE HOOGENBOOM Board Member
THOMAS ZWEIFEL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID FISHELSON Board President
ERANA KRATOUNIS VICE PRESIDE
MICHAEL JASCZ Board Member
DR HILDE HOOGENBOOM Board Member
THOMAS ZWEIFEL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (0 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 24 → 21 over 5 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.