Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
35
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 29.0% 35 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2023 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 60 Stable Stable Watch
2019 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LYNN NEUMAN Treasurer 29.0% of Rev
ALI RODELL Board President
GORDON VANAMBURG Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ali Rodell Board President
Gordon VanAmburg Board President
Lynn Neuman Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALI RODELL Board President
GORDON VANAMBURG SecretaryVice Chairpe
LYNN NEUMAN Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points above the peer median (55 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~14 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.