Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 15.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 — — 12.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 27.5% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 16.6% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 10.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 11.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 14.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLY FADNER Executive Director 7.0% of Rev
KRISTI TOWEY Executive Director 4.4% of Rev
BARBARA PARKER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
ISA CLAUDIO-ABDUL Board Member —
TERI DANCIK Board Member —
BRENNA STEIN Board Member —
MARILYN ITSKOWITCH Board Member —
TANYA STARACE Board Member —
GINA ENOCK Board President —
JOANNE EICHEL Board President —
SYLVIE OZON RICKMAN Secretary —
LYDIA TANG Treasurer —
JOHN DOUGHERTY Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLY FADNER Executive Director 6.0% of Rev
KRISTI TOWEY Executive Director 4.4% of Rev
BARBARA PARKER Board Member 0.2% of Rev
GINA ENOCK Board President —
JOANNE EICHEL Board President —
SYLVIE OZON RICKMAN Secretary —
LYDIA TANG Treasurer —
JOHN DOUGHERTY Board Member —
ISA CLAUDIO-ABDUL Board Member —
TERI DANCIK Board Member —
BRENNA STEIN Board Member —
MARILYN ITSKOWITCH Board Member —
TANYA STARACE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTI TOWEY Executive Director 4.8% of Rev
JOHN DOUGHERTY Board President —
ISA CLAUDIO-ABDUL Board President —
GINA ENOCK Board President —
LYDIA TANG Treasurer —
SYLVIE OZON RICKMAN Secretary —
TERI DANCIK Board Member —
BRENNA STEIN Board Member —
BARBARA PARKER Board Member —
JOANNE EICHEL Board Member —
MARILYN ITSKOWITCH Board Member —
TANYA STARACE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 806 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 71 points below the peer median (0 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 29 → 29 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.