Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2022 — — 19.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 15.0% 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 20.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 20.9% 37 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 7.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 8.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 13.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 7.9% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 — — 6.6% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 42 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Brad Carlin Board Member 2.6% of Rev
Jessica Hanna Board President —
Christopher Healy Treasurer —
Alaxandra Kennedy-Scott Board President —
Ellen Lauren Board Member —
Samuel Stricklen Board Member —
Darron West Board Member —
Will Bond Board Member —
Maria McColl Board Member —
Melissa Coleman Reed Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Brad Carlin Board Member 2.6% of Rev
Ellen Lauren Board Member 1.1% of Rev
Darron West Board Member 0.9% of Rev
Will Bond Board Member 0.2% of Rev
Jessica Hanna Board President —
Diane Ragsdale Secretary —
Christopher Healy Treasurer —
Alaxandra Kennedy-Scott Board President —
Samuel Stricklen Board Member —
Maria McColl Board Member —
Melissa Coleman Reed Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELLE PRESTON EXECUTIVE DIR. 6.3% of Rev
LEON INGULSRUD Artistic Director 4.0% of Rev
ELLEN LAUREN PITZ Artistic Director 3.7% of Rev
ANNE BOGART Artistic Director 3.7% of Rev
SAMUEL STRICKLEN Board Member 1.3% of Rev
JESSICA HANNA Board President —
RUTH NIGHTENGALE Secretary —
ALEXANDRA KENNEDY-SCOTT Board President —
CHRIS HEALY Treasurer —
DIANE RAGSDALE Board Member —
KIM IMA Board Member —
JENNIFER GREENFIELD Board Member —
KEVIN KUHLKE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michelle Preston Executive Dir. 6.7% of Rev
Ellen Lauren Pitz Artistic Director 3.0% of Rev
Leon Ingulsrud Artistic Director 2.8% of Rev
Anne Bogart Artistic Director 1.3% of Rev
J Ed Araiza Board Member 0.6% of Rev
Jessica Hanna Board President —
Ruth Nightengale Secretary —
Alexandra Kennedy-Scott Board President —
Chris Healy Treasurer —
Diane Ragsdale Board Member —
Kim Ima Board Member —
Jennifer Greenfield Board Member —
Kevin Kuhlke Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michelle Preston Executive Dir. 5.9% of Rev
Leon Ingulsrud Artistic Director 3.0% of Rev
Ellen Lauren Pitz Artistic Director 2.8% of Rev
J Ed Araiza Board Member 1.3% of Rev
Anne Bogart Artistic Director 0.7% of Rev
Jessica Hanna Secretary —
Alexandra Kennedy-Scott Board President —
Chris Healy Treasurer —
Diane Ragsdale Board Member —
Kim Ima Board Member —
Jennifer Greenfield Board Member —
Kevin Kuhlke Board Member —
Ruth Nightengale Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 47 points below the peer median (5 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.