Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 6.2% 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 14.7% 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 32.1% 37 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 15.0% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 15.0% 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 23.9% 39 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN GUERRA Executive Director 6.6% of Rev
MELVILLE BROWN Executive Director 4.0% of Rev
DOUGLAS W MEYER Board President
DAVID NUSSENBAUM Treasurer
BRENDA VINCENT Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHILIP KWOKA Executive Director 8.7% of Rev
MELVILLE BROWN Executive Director 5.2% of Rev
DOUGLAS W MEYER Board President
DAVID NUSSENBAUM Treasurer
BRENDA VINCENT Secretary
STEPHEN GUERRA Executive Director

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHILIP KWOKA Executive Director 15.4% of Rev
DOUGLAS W MEYER Board President
YOSHIAKI KO Treasurer
BRENDA VINCENT Secretary
MELVILLE BROWN Board Member
JULIA EGOROVA Board Member
KONSTANTINE SOUKHOVETSKI Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points above the peer median (45 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 46 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.