Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 41 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Fragile Recovery
2016 9.3% 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Robert Shampain Board Member 30.0% of Rev
Lynda Humphrey Board Member
Jonelle Adams Board Member
Scott Hunter Board Member
Wendy Morgan Board Member
Thomas Hier Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Hunter Board Member
Lynda Humphrey Board Member
Jonelle Adams Board Member
Scott Hunter Board Member
Wendy Morgan Board Member
Thomas Hier Board Member
Robert Shampain Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janet Hunter Board Member
Lynda Humphrey Board Member
Jonelle Adams Board Member
Scott Hunter Board Member
Wendy Morgan Board Member
Thomas Hier Board Member
Janet Hunter Board Member
Lynda Humphrey Board Member
Jonelle Adams Board Member
Scott Hunter Board Member
Wendy Morgan Board Member
Thomas Hier Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points above the peer median (75 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.