Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 13.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 13.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 14.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 17.1% 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 13.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 11.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 14.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 15.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 14.9% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 16.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 14.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 19.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 17.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETSY KING MILITELLO Executive Director 11.0% of Rev
Kwofe A Coleman Board President
Kate Galvin Board President
Anthony Rodriguez Board President
Hillary Hart Treasurer
Eric Keen-Louie Secretary
Pamela Adams Board Member
Bill Berry Board Member
Elisbeth Challener Board Member
Snehal Desai Board Member
Rick Edinger Board Member
Mark Fleischer Board Member
Marguerite Hannah Board Member
Mac Ingram Board Member
Dan Murphy Board Member
Aaron Thielen Board Member
RACHEL TISCHLER Board Member
Jennifer Jaquess Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETSY KING MILITELLO Executive Director 10.4% of Rev
BETSY KING MILITELLO Executive Director 10.1% of Rev
MICHAEL BARON Board Member
ELISBETH CHALLENER Board President
PAIGE PRICE Board Member
MICHAEL G MURPHY Board President
KENNY ALHADEFF Board President
SOREN MOLLER Board Member
DANA HARREL Board Member
LORI FINEMAN Board Member
KWOFE COLEMAN Secretary
CURT DALE CLARK Board President
KENT GASH Board Member
PAMELA ADAMS Treasurer
DAN MURPHY Board Member
KATE GALVIN Board Member
AARON THIELEN Board Member
BILL BERRY Board Member
ANGELA GRANT Board Member
HILLARY HART Board Member
ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ Board Member
Eric Keen-Louie Board Member
MICHAEL G MURPHY Board President
KWOFE A COLEMAN Board President
KATE GALVIN Board President
PAMELA ADAMS Treasurer
HILLARY HART Secretary
BILL BERRY Board Member
ELISBETH CHALLENER Board Member
CURT DALE CLARK Board Member
LORI FINEMAN Board Member
MARK FLEISCHER Board Member
KENT GASH Board Member
MAC INGRAM Board Member
ERIC KEEN-LOUIE Board Member
DAN MURPHY Board Member
ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ Board Member
AARON THIELEN Board Member
RACHEL TISCHLER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 34 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (0 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 32 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.