Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 — — 13.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 — — 13.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 14.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 17.1% 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 13.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 11.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 14.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 15.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 14.9% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — 16.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 14.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 19.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 17.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETSY KING MILITELLO Executive Director 11.0% of Rev
Kwofe A Coleman Board President —
Kate Galvin Board President —
Anthony Rodriguez Board President —
Hillary Hart Treasurer —
Eric Keen-Louie Secretary —
Pamela Adams Board Member —
Bill Berry Board Member —
Elisbeth Challener Board Member —
Snehal Desai Board Member —
Rick Edinger Board Member —
Mark Fleischer Board Member —
Marguerite Hannah Board Member —
Mac Ingram Board Member —
Dan Murphy Board Member —
Aaron Thielen Board Member —
RACHEL TISCHLER Board Member —
Jennifer Jaquess Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETSY KING MILITELLO Executive Director 10.4% of Rev
BETSY KING MILITELLO Executive Director 10.1% of Rev
MICHAEL BARON Board Member —
ELISBETH CHALLENER Board President —
PAIGE PRICE Board Member —
MICHAEL G MURPHY Board President —
KENNY ALHADEFF Board President —
SOREN MOLLER Board Member —
DANA HARREL Board Member —
LORI FINEMAN Board Member —
KWOFE COLEMAN Secretary —
CURT DALE CLARK Board President —
KENT GASH Board Member —
PAMELA ADAMS Treasurer —
DAN MURPHY Board Member —
KATE GALVIN Board Member —
AARON THIELEN Board Member —
BILL BERRY Board Member —
ANGELA GRANT Board Member —
HILLARY HART Board Member —
ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ Board Member —
Eric Keen-Louie Board Member —
MICHAEL G MURPHY Board President —
KWOFE A COLEMAN Board President —
KATE GALVIN Board President —
PAMELA ADAMS Treasurer —
HILLARY HART Secretary —
BILL BERRY Board Member —
ELISBETH CHALLENER Board Member —
CURT DALE CLARK Board Member —
LORI FINEMAN Board Member —
MARK FLEISCHER Board Member —
KENT GASH Board Member —
MAC INGRAM Board Member —
ERIC KEEN-LOUIE Board Member —
DAN MURPHY Board Member —
ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ Board Member —
AARON THIELEN Board Member —
RACHEL TISCHLER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 124 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 68 points below the peer median (0 vs. 68).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 32 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.