Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
39
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 17.1% 39 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 14.5% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 20.9% 41 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2010 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK MORGANELLI Executive Director 9.8% of Rev
MARK MORGANELLI Executive Director 9.8% of Rev
ELLEN PRIOR CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER 8.4% of Rev
ELLEN PRIOR CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER 8.4% of Rev
SARA LANGBERT Board President —
JOHN GUNTHER-MOHR Board President —
ZACHARY CARTER Board Member —
EVAN CHARKES Board Member —
MATTHEW COOLEEN Board Member —
ROBERT GRAEF Board Member —
ROBIN BELL-STEVENS Board Member —
NEIL BENSON Board Member —
RAYNALD LEVEQUE Board Member —
ANTHONY MACELI Board Member —
PAULA ROMANOW ETZEL Board Member —
ADAM R ROSE Board Member —
KATHRYN SLOCUM Board Member —
BARRY STRUTT Board Member —
DENISE DURHAM WILLIAMS Board Member —
SARA LANGBERT Board President —
JOHN GUNTHER-MOHR Board President —
ZACHARY CARTER Board Member —
EVAN CHARKES Board Member —
MATTHEW COOLEEN Board Member —
ROBERT GRAEF Board Member —
ROBIN BELL-STEVENS Board Member —
NEIL BENSON Board Member —
RAYNALD LEVEQUE Board Member —
ANTHONY MACELI Board Member —
PAULA ROMANOW ETZEL Board Member —
ADAM R ROSE Board Member —
KATHRYN SLOCUM Board Member —
BARRY STRUTT Board Member —
DENISE DURHAM WILLIAMS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK MORGANELLI EXEC. DIRECT 6.5% of Rev
ELLEN PRIOR CHIEF OPERAT 5.6% of Rev
ROBIN BELL-STEVENS Board Member —
NEIL BENSON Board Member —
ZACH CARTER Board Member —
EVAN CHARKES Board Member —
PAULA ETZEL Board Member —
ROBERT GRAEF Board Member —
JOHN GUNTHER-MOHR BOARD PRESID —
SARA LANGBERT Board Member —
KATHRYN SLOCUM Board Member —
BARRY STRUTT Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK MORGANELLI EXEC. DIRECT 5.9% of Rev
ELLEN PRIOR Executive Director 3.0% of Rev
PAULA ETZEL Board Member —
MONICA GETZ Board Member —
ROBERT GRAEF Board Member —
JOHN GUNTHER-MOHR BOARD PRESID —
SARA LANGBERT Board Member —
ED RUTLAND Board Member —
KATHRYN SLOCUM Board Member —
BARRY STRUTT Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,227 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points below the peer median (20 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.