Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
33
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 17.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 19.3% 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 23.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 15.2% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 14.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 15.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 15.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 19.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 20.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 21.4% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 29.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 35.0% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY KORF Board President 17.5% of Rev
JOSEPH D' AMBROSIO Board Member
HELEN FORSTER Board Member
MICHAEL C NARDO CHAIRMAN
REX L NISWANDER Board Member
SANDY RIPPE Board Member
GEORGE ROTHMAN Board Member
EDWAR L SCHIFF VICE CHAIRMA
JUDITH THORN Board Member
LISA TORMINO Board Member
LYNN SPURGAT Secretary
PHILLIP Y ZHANG Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY KORF Board President 17.5% of Rev
MICHAEL C NARDO CHAIRMAN
EDWARD L SCHIFF VICE CHAIRMAN
PHILLIP Y ZHANG Treasurer
LYNN SPURGAT Secretary
JOSEPH D'AMBROSIO Board Member
HELEN FORSTER Board Member
REX L NISWANDER Board Member
SANDY RIPPE Board Member
GEORGE ROTHMAN Board Member
JUDITH THORN Board Member
LISA TORMINO Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY KORF Board President 17.2% of Rev
GEORGE ROTHMAN Board Member 1.1% of Rev
MICHAEL C NARDO CHAIRMAN
EDWARD L SCHIFF VICE CHAIRMAN
PHILLIP Y ZHANG Treasurer
LYNN SPURGAT Secretary
JOSEPH D'AMBROSIO Board Member
HELEN FORSTER Board Member
REX L NISWANDER Board Member
SANDY RIPPE Board Member
JUDITH THORN Board Member
LISA TORMINO Board Member
IAN M CHOE Board Member
JOSE F CORREA Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY KORF Board President 17.3% of Rev
GEORGE ROTHMAN Board Member 3.0% of Rev
MICHAEL C NARDO CHAIRMAN
EDWARD L SCHIFF VICE CHAIRMAN
PHILLIP Y ZHANG Treasurer
LYNN SPURGAT Secretary
IAN M CHOE Board Member
JOSE F CORREA Board Member
JOSEPH D'AMBROSIO Board Member
HELEN FORSTER Board Member
REX L NISWANDER Board Member
SANDY RIPPE Board Member
JUDITH THORN Board Member
LISA TORMINO Board Member
FADI FINDAKLY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points below the peer median (15 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.