Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
19
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 1.4% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 10.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 14.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 15.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 5.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK KELLY CHAIRMAN —
EMILIE STUART Treasurer —
ROBERT RAPHAEL JUST Board Member —
CHARLES MCATEER Board Member —
LILY MCATEER Board Member —
EVE POMERANCE Board Member —
HELEN TWISS Board Member —
SABRA JONES Artistic Director —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SABRA JONES Artistic Director 11.9% of Rev
HELEN TWISS CHAIRMAN —
SARAH JANE EIGERMAN Treasurer —
MARK KELLY Board Member —
THOMAS MCATEER Board Member —
MARILYN S MILLER Board Member —
EMILIE STUART Board Member —
EVE POMERANCE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
19 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,227 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (0 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 31 → 19 over 5 years (declining by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.