Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
22
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 25.8% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 36.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 19.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — — 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA MORGULIS Executive Dir. 15.0% of Rev
JONATHAN CHAPMAN Executive Dir. 10.1% of Rev
NINA MEEHAN Board Member —
JULIA MAGNASCO Board Member —
MATTHEW GUTSCHICK Board President —
MIREYA HEPNER Board Member —
MEGAN ALRUTZ Board Member —
KATIE CAMPBELL Board Member —
ELLEN CONN Treasurer —
SAMMY LOPEZ Board Member —
MICHAEL HAMMERSTROM Board Member —
IDRIS GOODWIN Board President —
ELIZABETH HORN Board Member —
MIN KAHNG Board Member —
KIM KERN Board Member —
JENNY KOPPERA Board Member —
ANITA MENON Board Member —
TIFFANY MALTOS Board Member —
ALLISON MUI Secretary —
ERNIE NOLAN Board Member —
HARRY POSTER Board Member —
SHELLEY QUIALA Board Member —
ANA ROMES Board Member —
JEREMY WINCHESTER Board Member —
AIKO BETHEA Board Member —
OLIVIA ASTON BOSWORTH Board Member —
DANIEL HAHN Board Member —
JACQUELIN HANDY Board Member —
REIKO HO Board Member —
TODD HULET Board Member —
JOANNE SEELIG LAMPARTER Board Member —
THORIN SHAMBRAY Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN CHAPMAN Executive Dir. 20.0% of Rev
NINA MEEHAN Board President —
JULIA MAGNASCO Board President —
MATTHEW GUSCHICK Secretary —
MIREYA HEPNER Treasurer —
MEGAN ALRUTZ Board Member —
KATIE CAMPBELL Board Member —
ELLEN CONN Board Member —
ANDREW FRANK Board Member —
ALICIA FUSS Board Member —
IDRIS GOODWIN Board Member —
ELIZABETH HORN Board Member —
MIN KAHNG Board Member —
KIM KERN Board Member —
JENNY KOPPERA Board Member —
ANITA MENON Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER MOSES Board Member —
ALLISON MUI Board Member —
ERNIE NOLAN Board Member —
HARRY POSTER Board Member —
SHELLEY QUIALA Board Member —
ANA ROMES Board Member —
DEXTER SINGLETON Board Member —
JEREMY WINCHESTER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (0 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 22 over 5 years (declining by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.