Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
22
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 25.8% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 36.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 19.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA MORGULIS Executive Dir. 15.0% of Rev
JONATHAN CHAPMAN Executive Dir. 10.1% of Rev
NINA MEEHAN Board Member
JULIA MAGNASCO Board Member
MATTHEW GUTSCHICK Board President
MIREYA HEPNER Board Member
MEGAN ALRUTZ Board Member
KATIE CAMPBELL Board Member
ELLEN CONN Treasurer
SAMMY LOPEZ Board Member
MICHAEL HAMMERSTROM Board Member
IDRIS GOODWIN Board President
ELIZABETH HORN Board Member
MIN KAHNG Board Member
KIM KERN Board Member
JENNY KOPPERA Board Member
ANITA MENON Board Member
TIFFANY MALTOS Board Member
ALLISON MUI Secretary
ERNIE NOLAN Board Member
HARRY POSTER Board Member
SHELLEY QUIALA Board Member
ANA ROMES Board Member
JEREMY WINCHESTER Board Member
AIKO BETHEA Board Member
OLIVIA ASTON BOSWORTH Board Member
DANIEL HAHN Board Member
JACQUELIN HANDY Board Member
REIKO HO Board Member
TODD HULET Board Member
JOANNE SEELIG LAMPARTER Board Member
THORIN SHAMBRAY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN CHAPMAN Executive Dir. 20.0% of Rev
NINA MEEHAN Board President
JULIA MAGNASCO Board President
MATTHEW GUSCHICK Secretary
MIREYA HEPNER Treasurer
MEGAN ALRUTZ Board Member
KATIE CAMPBELL Board Member
ELLEN CONN Board Member
ANDREW FRANK Board Member
ALICIA FUSS Board Member
IDRIS GOODWIN Board Member
ELIZABETH HORN Board Member
MIN KAHNG Board Member
KIM KERN Board Member
JENNY KOPPERA Board Member
ANITA MENON Board Member
CHRISTOPHER MOSES Board Member
ALLISON MUI Board Member
ERNIE NOLAN Board Member
HARRY POSTER Board Member
SHELLEY QUIALA Board Member
ANA ROMES Board Member
DEXTER SINGLETON Board Member
JEREMY WINCHESTER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (0 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 22 over 5 years (declining by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.