Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

"Provides affordable access to diverse local, national, and international performances, educating and celebrating the traditions of the Bronx's multi-cultural community."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 42 Fragile Recovery
2015 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 42 Fragile Recovery
2013 0.2% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 0.2% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR FERNANDO DELGADO Board Member 17.3% of Rev
RENE ROTOLO Board Member 9.6% of Rev
TEMESGEN GEBREKIDAN NON-VOTING Treasurer 7.7% of Rev
DANTE ALBERTIE NON-VOTING Executive Director 7.0% of Rev
EVA BORNSTEIN NON-VOTING Executive Director 6.7% of Rev
SHEKERA A ALGARIN ESQ Board Member
DESIREE LASTER HAYES ESQ Board Member
DR BEVERLY RAUDALES Secretary
ANDREA ROCKOWER Treasurer
MAXIMILLIAN TUCCI Board Member
AMAURYS VALDEZ Board Member
MICHAEL J VOLPE ESQ Board President
DR VALERIE WASHINGTON Board Member
GARY WEINBERG Board President
CRISTINA N WOLFF CPA Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUSAN E EBERSOLE Board Member 10.9% of Rev
GINA HARWOOD Treasurer 8.2% of Rev
DR FERNANDO DELGADO Board Member 8.0% of Rev
EVA BORNSTEIN Executive Director 6.5% of Rev
DR BEVERLY RAUDALES Board Member
ANDREA ROCKOWER Board President
MAXIMILLIAN TUCCI Board Member
MICHAEL J VOLPE ESQ Board Member
GARY WEINBERG Board President
CRISTINA N WOLFF CPA Board Member
DR VALERIE WASHINGTON Board Member
MARISSA LEVY LERER Treasurer
MICHELE PAGNOTTA Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR DANIEL LEMONS Board Member 17.7% of Rev
SUSAN E EBERSOLE Board Member 11.3% of Rev
GINA HARWOOD Board Member 8.6% of Rev
EVA BORNSTEIN Executive Director 6.8% of Rev
ANDREA ROCKOWER Board President
GARY WEINBERG Secretary
MARISSA LEVY LERER Board Member
MICHELE PAGNOTTA Board Member
MAXIMILLIAN TUCCI Board Member
MICHAEL J VOLPE ESQ Board Member
CRISTINA WOLFF CPA Treasurer
DR VALERIE WASHINGTON Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR DANIEL LEMONS Board Member 11.6% of Rev
SUSAN E EBERSOLE Board Member 10.9% of Rev
GINA HARWOOD Board Member 7.8% of Rev
EVA BORNSTEIN Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
ANDREA ROCKOWER Board President
VALERIE WASHINGTON Board President
GARY WEINBERG Secretary
LENNY CARO Board Member
CRISTINA N WOLFF CPA Treasurer
MARGARET ISA BUTLER Board Member
MAXIMILLIAN TUCCI Board Member
MICHAEL J VOLPE ESQ Board Member
FRANCESCO BIONDO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.